Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2Knowledge Management and TechnologyDecision Support System ApplicationsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On information system semantics: Expert vs. decision support systems

Open access
Lee, R.M.·1985·Social Science Information Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0143-6236(85)90002-x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1981, Vol. 1

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Lee, R. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, R.M.
Venue
Social Science Information Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
3-10
ISSN
0143-6236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001647029
Cited by
2
References
25
Citations by year
2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science Information Studies (publishedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
expert systems, decision support system, formal semantics, artificial intelligence in management, organizational management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On information system semantics: Expert vs. decision support systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0143-6236(85)90002-x
The paper
Lee, R. M. (1985). On information system semantics: Expert vs. decision support systems. Social Science Information Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-6236(85)90002-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.