Cited by 7,028Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy, Science, and History

Naming and Necessity

Kripke, Saul A.·1972·Semantics of Natural Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zombie-Jackson has intentional states.

    “Contrary to Searle, a good case can be made that zombie-Jackson does have intentional states.”

    From Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem (1999) · cites this paper as Kripke 1972

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kripke, S. A.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Kripke, Saul A.
Venue
Semantics of Natural Language
Published
1972
Volume
17
Issue
217
Pages
253-355
OpenAlex
W1516748551
Cited by
7,028
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 198 · 2020: 295 · 2019: 370 · 2018: 277 · 2017: 277 · 2016: 262 · 2015: 273 · 2014: 295 · 2013: 285 · 2012: 257
FWCI
52.75
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Philosophy
  • Critica
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
Keywords
naming, necessity, reference, mind-body problem, identity thesis, materialism, contingency, substance, natural kinds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review