Cited by 435Radiation Dose and ImagingEffects of Radiation ExposureAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Quantities used in radiological protection

·1991·Annals of the ICRP

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0146-6453(91)90066-p

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most significant change in neutron wR from ICRP Publication 60 to 92 stemmed from disregard of the much higher photon component of the neutron dose when low energy neutrons interact in a larger size receptor.

    “The most significant change in neutron wR from ICRP Publication 605 to its reevaluation in ICRP Publication 926 stemmed indeed from the disregard of the much higher photon component of the neutron dose when low energy neutrons interact in a larger size receptor.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Annals of the ICRP
Published
1991-01
Volume
21
Issue
1-3
Pages
4-11
ISSN
  • 0146-6453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-969X
OpenAlex
W4239173708
Cited by
435
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of the ICRP (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Keywords
radiation protection, radiation quantities, radiation dose, radiation protection dosimetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review