The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations
Abstract
Content analysis is a research technique used to objectively and systematically make inferences about the intentions, attitudes, and values of individuals by identifying specified characteristics in textual messages. The unobtrusive nature of content analysis makes it well suited for strategic management research. To date, the content analyses in most management studies have been performed by human coders, despite advances in computer technology that enable researchers to perform the same analyses more reliably and less expensively. In this paper, the investigator compares human-coded content analysis to computerized coding of the same text communications. The results suggest the two methods may be equally effective. Differences in results obtained using different units of analysis (such as analysis by sentence, by paragraph or by whole document) are also examined. Better reliability, improved stability, and comparability of results suggest more extensive use of computerized content analysis in future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Cited by
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106289252 · Cited by 1,544
Risius, M., & Spohrer, K. (2017) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-017-0506-0 · Cited by 803
Short, J. C., Broberg, J. C., Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109335949 · Cited by 644
Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636
Paul, D. L., & McDaniel, R. R. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148633 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 903-931
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001664092
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90035-3
- The paper
- Morris, R. (1994). Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90035-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.