Cited by 184

Towards an improved serum-free, chemically defined medium for long-term culturing of cerebral cortex tissue

Romijn, H.J., van Huizen, F., Wolters, P.S.·1984·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The present study describes a series of experiments which have led to a substantially improved serum-free, chemically defined medium (CDM) for long-term culturing of reaggregated fetal rat cerebral cortex tissue. A reduction of the original medium concentrations of the hormones insuline, T3 and corticosterone, on the one hand, and an enrichment of the medium with the vitamins A, C and E, the unsaturated fatty acids linoleic and linolenic acid, and biotin, L-carnitine, D(+)-galactose, glutathione (reduced) and ethanolamine, on the other hand, formed the most important chemical adjustments of the medium. With the aid of this CDM (encoded R12), the light- and electron microscopic architecture of the tissue could be kept in a good condition (superior to that seen earlier in serum-supplemented medium) up to 23 days in vitro. From that time on, the neuronal network lying between the reaggregates degenerated for the largest part, while a portion of the large neurons (probably pyramidal cells) plus some of the neuronal network within the reaggregates degenerated too. This degeneration process continued during the following weeks, but the reaggregates nevertheless retained most of their mass, so that both small and large neuronal cell bodies (visible in transparent regions at the edge of the reaggregates) remained in good condition up to at least 103 DIV. Stout, thick nerve bundles interconnecting the reaggregates, also survived up to this point. Electron microscopic evaluation of suc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0149-7634(84)90055-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romijn, H. J., van Huizen, F., & Wolters, P. S.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
301-334
ISSN
0149-7634
Cited by
184
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review