Cited by 353Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence

Marshalek, Brachia, Lohman, David F., Snow, Richard E.·1983·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0160-2896(83)90023-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Matrix Reasoning subtest, used as the best available index of Gf, had an even smaller effect size and showed a non-significant difference (p > .10) after correction for multiple comparisons.

    “The Matrix Reasoning subtest, used as the best available index of Gf (Marshalek et al., 1983;Carpenter et al., 1990), had an even smaller effect size and showed a non-significant difference (p > .10)after correction for multiple comparisons.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Marshalek, Brachia
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
107-127
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030364234
Cited by
353
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
16.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
general intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review