Cited by 479Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: a latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage.

Unsworth, Nash, Redick, Thomas S., Heitz, Richard P., Broadway, James M., Engle, Randall W.·2009·Memory

Abstract

Complex span tasks, assumed by many to measure an individual's working memory capacity, are predictive of several aspects of higher-order cognition. However, the underlying cause of the relationships between "processing-and-storage" tasks and cognitive abilities is still hotly debated nearly 30 years after the tasks were first introduced. The current study utilised latent constructs across verbal, numerical, and spatial content domains to examine a number of questions regarding the predictive power of complex span tasks. In particular, the relations among processing time, processing accuracy, and storage accuracy from the complex span tasks were examined, in combination with their respective relationships with fluid intelligence. The results point to a complicated pattern of unique and shared variance among the constructs. Implications for various theories of working memory are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658210902998047

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Faster speed processing has been proposed to reduce the possibility of items being forgotten, and less time for rehearsing or refreshing processes.

    “Similarly, faster speed processing has been proposed to reduce the possibility of items being forgotten, and less time for rehearsing or refreshing processes (Towse et al., 2000; Hudjetz and Oberauer, 2007; Unsworth et al., 2009).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Unsworth et al., 2009

  • Unsworth et al. (2009) reported a negative correlation between processing speed and WM maintenance.

    “Unsworth et al. (2009) reported a negative correlation between processing speed and WM maintenance”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Unsworth et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Memory
Published
2009-07-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
635-654
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2165331425
Cited by
479
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
complex span task, working memory capacity, higher-order cognition, fluid intelligence, processing time, processing accuracy, verbal span, spatial span, latent constructs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review