The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploiting cross-section variation for unit root inference in dynamic data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Panel data and unobservable individual effects
Hausman, J., & Taylor, W. (1981) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90085-3 · Cited by 2,309
Cited by
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7 · Cited by 12,849
Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data
Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557825 · Cited by 6,865
Unit root tests for panel data
Choi, I. (2001) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/s0261-5606(00)00048-6 · Cited by 4,113
Metadata
- Authors
- Quah, D.
- Venue
- Economics Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 9-19
- ISSN
- 0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1619038707
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
