Cited by 30Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Identification of cell types in rat hippocampal slices maintained in organotypic cultures

Beach, R.L., Bathgate, S.L., Cotman, C.W.·1982·Developmental Brain Research

Abstract

We have cultured transverse slices of the hippocampal formation from neonatal rats and have identified the cell types which appear in the outgrowth with cell type specific markers. Tetanus toxin and anti-tetanus toxoid, as well as antisera to neurofilaments and 14-3-2 protein, were used to identify neurons. Astrocytes were identified with antisera to glial fibrillary acidic protein and were the predominant non-neural cell type. Fibroblastic cells were labeled with antisera to fibronectin and to myosin and oligodendroglia were identified with antisera to galactocerebroside. The hippocampal neurons could be classified as 1 or the 3 types present in vivo (pyramidal cells, granule cells, or GABAergic interneurons) on the basis of their size, shape, location, or reaction with antisera to glutamic acid decarboxylase. Outgrowth of glial cells and neurites occurred within hours of explantation. Within a few days granule cell neurons migrated onto the glial cell layer from the explant. Their movement is probably related to their migration during in vivo development of the granule cell layer. Synapse formation was observed by electron microscopic analysis beginning about 3-5 days in vitro and areas of neuropil containing many synapses were observed after 3-4 weeks. This culture system should be useful for further studies on the cellular processes which occur during hippocampal development and plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0165-3806(82)90071-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beach, R. L., Bathgate, S. L., & Cotman, C. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Cotman, C.W.
Venue
Developmental Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
3-20
ISSN
0165-3806 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092623647
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
hippocampal slices, organotypic culture, cell type annotation, hippocampal neurons, astrocytes, fibroblastic cells, oligodendroglia, granule cells, pyramidal neurons, GABAergic interneurons, glutamic acid decarboxylase, glial fibrillary acidic protein, galactocerebroside, fibronectin, myosin, synaptogenesis, neuronal migration, hippocampal development, neonatal rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cytoskeleton, Fibroblasts, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Hippocampus, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Interneurons, Microscopy, Electron, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neuroglia, Neurons, Rats, Inbred Strains, Synapses, Culture Techniques, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review