The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Topographic Maps are Fundamental to Sensory Processing
Kaas, J. H. (1997) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(97)00094-4 · Cited by 478
Cephalometric and computed tomographic predictors of obstructive sleep apnea severity
Lowe, A. A., Fleetham, J. A., Adachi, S., & Ryan, C. F. (1995) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70101-x · Cited by 314
Skeletal indicators of locomotor adaptations in living and extinct rodents
Samuels, J. X., & Van Valkenburgh, B. (2008) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.10662 · Cited by 299
Interspecies Scaling of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: Initial Look
Ling, J., Zhou, H., Jiao, Q., & Davis, H. M. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1177/0091270009337134 · Cited by 144
Phylogenetic Analyses: Comparing Species to Infer Adaptations and Physiological Mechanisms
Rezende, E. L., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100079 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Mace, G.
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 548-549
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069980772
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0166-2236(85)90197-3
- The paper
- Mace, G. (1985). Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? Trends in Neurosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(85)90197-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
