Cited by 120Evolution and Paleontology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Phylogenetic Analyses: Comparing Species to Infer Adaptations and Physiological Mechanisms

Rezende, Enrico L., Diniz‐Filho, José Alexandre F.·2012·Comprehensive Physiology

Abstract

Comparisons among species have been a standard tool in animal physiology to understand how organisms function and adapt to their surrounding environment. During the last two decades, conceptual and methodological advances from different fields, including evolutionary biology and systematics, have revolutionized the way comparative analyses are performed, resulting in the advent of modern phylogenetic statistical methods. This development stems from the realization that conventional analytical methods assume that observations are statistically independent, which is not the case for comparative data because species often resemble each other due to shared ancestry. By taking evolutionary history explicitly into consideration, phylogenetic statistical methods can account for the confounding effects of shared ancestry in interspecific comparisons, improving the reliability of standard approaches such as regressions or correlations in comparative analyses. Importantly, these methods have also enabled researchers to address entirely new evolutionary questions, such as the historical sequence of events that resulted in current patterns of form and function, which can only be studied with a phylogenetic perspective. Here, we provide an overview of phylogenetic approaches and their importance for studying the evolution of physiological processes and mechanisms. We discuss the conceptual framework underlying these methods, and explain when and how phylogenetic information should be empl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cphy.c100079

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparative analyses need to consider the phylogenetic structure of the datasets that are analyzed.

    “Comparative analyses need to consider the phylogenetic structure of the datasets that are analyzed [41-43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rezende, E. L., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Venue
Comprehensive Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
639-674
ISSN
2040-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111721986
Cited by
120
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
phylogenetic comparative analysis, comparative physiology, shared ancestry, phylogenetic signal, phylogenetic regression, phylogenetic correlation, adaptive evolution, animal physiology
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review