Role of the neostriatal dopaminergic activity in sequencing and selecting behavioural strategies: facilitation of processes involved in selecting the best strategy in a stressful situation
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to detect the behavioural effect of drug-induced changes in the neostriatal dopaminergic activity upon the degree of intrinsic (self-generated) and extrinsic (externally produced) constraints on the selection of behavioural patterns in rats. Both systemic and neostriatal injections of extremely low doses of apomorphine and haloperidol were used to change the neostriatal dopaminergic activity. Behavioural changes were observed in (a) an open-field test, (b) a so-called 'swimming without escape' test, (c) a so-called 'swimming with escape' test, and (d) a test to detect deficiencies in sensory, motor and sensorimotor capacities required to perform both swimming tests. Evidence is found that the neostriatum, especially the neostriatal, dopaminergic activity determines the animal's ability to select the best strategy in a stressful situation by modifying the process of switching strategies under pressure of factors intrinsic to the organism: neither sensory neglect nor inability to initiate voluntary movements underlay the observed phenomena. It is suggested that the neostriatum determines the individual flexibility to cope with available sensory information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The meso-dorsal striatal dopamine system has long been thought to control behavioral selection.
“The meso-dorsal striatal (i.e., nigro-striatal) dopamine system has long been thought to control behavioral selection (Robbins, 1976; Cools, 1980; Wickens, 1993; Mink, 1996; Yin and Knowlton, 2006).”
From Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex (2007) · cites this paper as Cools, 1980
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 283
- Authors
- Cools, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Cools, A.R.
- ORCID
- Cools, A.R.
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 361-378
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041664592
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- neostriatum, dopaminergic activity, strategy selection, behavioral flexibility, stress, apomorphine, haloperidol, intrinsic constraints, swimming test, escape behavior, sensory neglect, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Apomorphine, Behavior, Animal, Corpus Striatum, Discrimination Learning, Dopamine, Escape Reaction, Haloperidol, Male, Motivation, Motor Activity, Neural Pathways, Problem Solving, Receptors, Dopamine, Stress, Physiological, Substantia Nigra, Swimming, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review