Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,816

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining

Güth, Werner, Schmittberger, Rolf, Schwarze, Bernd·1982·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
DOI 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Fouraker, 1963, Bargaining behavior
  2. Güth, 1976, Toward a more general study of v. Stackelberg-situations, Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Staa wissenschaft, 132, 592
  3. Güth, 1978, Zur theorie kollektiver Lohnverhandlungen
  4. Harsanyi, 1968, Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players, Management Science, 14, 159, 10.1287/mnsc.14.3.159 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Harsanyi, 1968, Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players, Management Science, 14, 320, 10.1287/mnsc.14.5.320 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Harsanyi, 1968, Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players, Management Science, 14, 486, 10.1287/mnsc.14.7.486 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Krelle, 1976, Preistheorie
  8. Kuhn, 1967, On games of fair division, Essays in mathematical economics in honor of Oskar Morgenstern, 29, 10.1515/9781400877386-004 · DOI
  9. Pazner, 1974, A difficulty in the concept of fairness, Review of Economic Studies, XLI, 441, 10.2307/2296762 · DOI
  10. Selten, 1975, Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25, 10.1007/BF01766400 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Selten, 1978, The chain store paradox, Theory and Decision, 9, 127, 10.1007/BF00131770 · DOI
  12. Selten, 1982, Emführung in die Theorie der Spiele mit envollständiger Information, Schriften der Vereins für Socialpolitik, N.F., 126, 81
  13. Stáhl, 1972, Bargaining theory
  14. Steinhous, 1948, the problem of fair division, Econometrica, 17, 101
  15. Stone, 1958, An experiment in bargaining games, Econometrica, 26, 286, 10.2307/1907590 · DOI

Cited by

See all 4,816

Metadata

Authors
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B.
Venue
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
367-388
ISSN
0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
OpenAlex
W2045744884
Cited by
4,816
References
0
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
The paper
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.