Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 104Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptographyComputer Science and Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A computer package for measuring the strength of encryption algorithms

Gustafson, H., Dawson, E., Nielsen, L., Caelli, W.·1994·Computers & Security

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0167-4048(94)90051-5

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Gustafson, H., Dawson, E., Nielsen, L., & Caelli, W.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
687-697
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976634091
Cited by
104
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
Keywords
cryptanalysis, cipher design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.