Cited by 59Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionChaos control and synchronizationComputer Science and Engineering

Hyperchaotic encryption based on multi-scroll piecewise linear systems

Open access
García-Martínez, M., Ontañón-García, L.J., Campos-Cantón, E., Čelikovský, S.·2015·Applied Mathematics and Computation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amc.2015.08.037

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multi-scroll chaotic maps can create many chaotic attractors and reach a more complex and random context than single-scroll chaotic systems.

    “However, in contrast, multi-scroll chaotic maps can create many chaotic attractors; thus, the multi-scroll chaotic map can reach a more complex and random context.”

    From Image adaptive encryption using EfficientNet B3 feature guided multi scroll chaotic map with modulo controlled pseudo parallel processing (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    Section 2 describes generating attractors with more scrolls by adding subsystems. Section 3 says that increasing the number of scrolls makes the dynamics more complex and reports better pseudorandom-sequence test results for four- and ten-scroll systems than for two- or three-scroll systems. The paper does not compare these systems with single-scroll systems, and it describes multiple scrolls within an attractor rather than multiple distinct chaotic attractors. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 59

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]37. IEEE computer society, IEEE standard for binary floating-point arithmetic, ansi/IEEE std 754, 1985, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp? arnumber=30711&filter%3DAND%28p_Publication_Number%3A2355%29.

Authors
García-Martínez, M., Ontañón-García, L. J., Campos-Cantón, E., & Čelikovský, S.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Scientific and Technological Research (MX)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Corresponding author
García-Martínez, M.
Venue
Applied Mathematics and Computation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
270
Pages
413-424
ISSN
0096-3003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1207136572
Cited by
59
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Mathematics and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Czech Science Foundation (13-20433S)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
Keywords
hyperchaotic systems, image encryption, symmetric encryption, pseudorandom sequence generation, switching law, NIST statistical tests, grayscale image encryption, four-dimensional systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review