Cited by 136Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery: epidemiology, risk factors and preventive trials

Frost, Lars, Mølgaard, Henning, Christiansen, Evald Høj, Hjortholm, Kirsten, Paulsen, Peter K., Thomsen, Poul Erik Bloch·1992·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are common arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting. Although the consequences of the arrhythmia are generally not life-threatening, it constitutes a major clinical problem often requiring conversion to sinus rhythm. Atrial fibrillation or flutter can result in hypotension, heart failure, pneumonia, and stroke. This article reviews the literature on epidemiology, electrophysiology, risk factors, and preventive trials. The major conclusions are: (1) In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter is 20-30%, the peak incidence being on the second or third postoperative day. (2) The strongest independent preoperative predictor for atrial fibrillation or flutter is the patients' age. (3) Intra-atrial conduction delay recorded pre and peroperatively may predict development of atrial fibrillation. (4) Peroperative inducibility of atrial fibrillation by pacing the right atrium may identify patients at risk for postoperative atrial fibrillation. (5) Development of postoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter has not been associated with peroperative or postoperative events. (6) The specificity and sensitivity of age and other possible relevant factors for prediction of atrial fibrillation or flutter after coronary artery bypass grafting is low. (7) No effective prophylactic regimen has yet been established.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0167-5273(92)90293-c

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, L., Mølgaard, H., Christiansen, E. H., Hjortholm, K., Paulsen, P. K., & Thomsen, P. E. B.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-09
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
253-261
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065969709
Cited by
136
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, coronary artery bypass grafting, postoperative arrhythmia, risk factors, right atrial pacing, age as predictor, prophylaxis, incidence, conversion to sinus rhythm
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Age Factors, Coronary Artery Bypass, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Electrophysiology, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review