The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Logic of proofs
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this spirit, current 'logic of proofs' (starting from Artemov 1994) is developing a general take on evidence combination, and one can view the 'labeled deductive systems' of Gabbay 1996 as a program with similar ambitions.”
From THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION (2008) · cites this paper as Artemov 1994
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE STORIES OF LOGIC AND INFORMATION
van Benthem, J., & Martinez, M. (2008) · Philosophy of Information · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51726-5.50012-1 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Artëmov, S.
- Venue
- Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 29-59
- ISSN
- 0168-0072 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093281783
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Mathematical Sciences
- Army Research Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Topology and Set Theory
- Keywords
- logic of proofs, provability logic, axiomatic systems, Kripke semantics, decision procedures, completeness theorem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review