Cited by 135Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAdvanced Algebra and LogicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Logic of proofs

Open access
Artëmov, Sergei·1994·Annals of Pure and Applied Logic

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0168-0072(94)90007-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Guaspary, 1979, Rosser sentences, Ann. Math. Logic, 16, 81, 10.1016/0003-4843(79)90017-2 · DOI
  2. Solovay, 1976, Provability interpretations of modal logic, Israel J. Math., 25, 287, 10.1007/BF02757006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 135

Metadata

Authors
Artëmov, S.
Venue
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-05
Volume
67
Issue
1-3
Pages
29-59
ISSN
0168-0072 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093281783
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Mathematical Sciences
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Topology and Set Theory
Keywords
logic of proofs, provability logic, axiomatic systems, Kripke semantics, decision procedures, completeness theorem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review