The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The evolution of greenways as an adaptive urban landscape form
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The current regional, segmented, and unit-based protection models have resulted in the fragmentation and isolation of heritage conservation efforts.
“The current regional, segmented, and unitbased protection models have resulted in the fragmentation and isolation of heritage conservation efforts 6 .”
From Circuit theory-based cultural heritage corridor network development in qin river basin (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- City of Santa Clarita Parks and Recreation Department, 1991, Santa Clara River Study, Exhibit 9, 43
- Coats, 1993, Pipeline dream puts trail up, gas below, Saint Petersburg Times
- Grove, 1990, Greenways: Paths to the Future, Nat. Geogr., 177, 77
- Noss, 1987, Protecting natural areas in fragmented landscapes, Nat. Areas J., 7, 2
- 1990, Newsletter
- Searns, 1980, Denver tames the unruly Platte, Landscape Archit., 70, 382
- Simberloff, 1987, Consequences and costs of conservation corridors, Conserv. Biol., 1, 63, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1987.tb00010.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circuit theory-based cultural heritage corridor network development in qin river basin
Lin, Z., & Li, B. (2025) · npj Heritage Science · doi:10.1038/s40494-025-01906-5 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Searns, R. M.
- Venue
- Landscape and Urban Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 65-80
- ISSN
- 0169-2046
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
