The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Carbone, 1983, Comparing for different time series methods the value of technical expertise, individualized analysis, and judgmental adjustment, Management Science, 29, 559, 10.1287/mnsc.29.5.559 · DOI
- DeGroot, 1974, Reaching a consensus, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 118, 10.2307/2285509 · DOI
- Einhorn, 1974, Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 562, 10.1037/h0037164 · DOI · Paper page
- French, 1985, Vol. 2, 183
- Genest, 1986, Combining probability distributions: A critique and annotated bibliography, Statistical Science, 1, 114, 10.1214/ss/1177013825 · DOI · Paper page
- Hill, 1982, Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one?, Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517, 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517 · Paper page
- 1847, Vol. 7, 531
- Lorge, 1958, A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, Psychological Bulletin, 55, 337, 10.1037/h0042344 · DOI · Paper page
- Makridakis, 1979, Accuracy of forecasting: An empirical investigation (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 142, 97, 10.2307/2345077 · DOI · Paper page
- Makridakis, 1974, An interactive forecasting system, American Statistician, 28, 153, 10.2307/2683343 · doi:10.2307/2683343
- McConway, 1981, Marginalization and linear opinion pools, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 410, 10.2307/2287843 · doi:10.2307/2287843
- Stigler, 1973, Laplace, Fisher, and the discovery of the concept of sufficiency, Biometrika, 60, 439, 10.2307/2334992 · doi:10.2307/2334992
Cited by
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future
Weron, R. (2014) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,646
Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty
Draper, D. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02015.x · Cited by 1,599
Chapter 4 Forecast Combinations
Timmermann, A. (2006) · Handbook of Economic Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s1574-0706(05)01004-9 · Cited by 1,314
Short-term traffic forecasting: where we are and where we’re going
Vlahogianni, E. I., Karlaftis, M. G., & Golias, J. C. (2014) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.01.005 · Cited by 1,132
Metadata
- Authors
- Clemen, R. T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Forecasting
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-583
- ISSN
- 0169-2070 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993387039
- Cited by
- 2,164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0169-2070(89)90012-5
- The paper
- Clemen, R. T. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(89)90012-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
