CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,033Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation

Furnham, Adrian·1986·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Eysenck, 1982, The components of Type A behavior and its genetic determinants, Activitas nervosa Suppl., 1, 111
  2. Keehn, 1961, Response sets and the Maudsley Personality Inventory Scores, Psychol. Rep., 64, 229
  3. Salas, 1968, Fakability of responses on the Eysenck Personality Inventory, J. Psychol., 20, 55

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,033

Related

Metadata

Authors
Furnham, A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Furnham, Adrian
ORCID
Furnham, Adrian
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-01
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
385-400
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0
OpenAlex
W2024132711
Cited by
1,033
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
response bias, social desirability, dissimulation, faking, self-report measures, Eysenck Personality Inventory, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, response sets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review