Cited by 2,340Survey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and TestingSurvey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review

Nederhof, Anton J.·1985·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Social desirability is one of the most common sources of bias affecting the validity of experimental and survey research findings. From a self‐presentational perspective, social desirability can be regarded as the resultant of two separate factors: self‐deception and other‐deception. Two main modes of coping with social desirability bias are distinguished. The first mode comprises two methods aimed at the detection and measurement of social desirability bias: the use of social desirability scales, and the rating of item desirability. A second category comprises seven methods to prevent or reduce social desirability bias, including the use of forced‐choice items, the randomized response technique, the bogus pipeline, self‐administration of the questionnaire, the selection of interviewers, and the use of proxy subjects. Not one method was found to excel completely and under all conditions in coping with both other‐deceptive and self‐deceptive social desirability bias. A combination of prevention and detection methods offers the best choice available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.2420150303

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans similarly refrain from demonstrating negative sentiments when distant to maintain a positive social image.

    “On the other hand, F/BBT agents entirely refrain from demonstrating negative sentiments when they are distant from their acquaintances/neighbours to maintain a positive social image, similar to humans (Nederhof, 1985).”

    From Humanoid Agents: Platform for Simulating Human-like Generative Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Nederhof, 1985

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nederhof, A. J.
Corresponding author
Nederhof, Anton J.
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-07
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
263-280
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2046622454
Cited by
2,340
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 159 · 2025: 218 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 175 · 2021: 186 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 60
FWCI
21.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Keywords
social desirability bias, self-presentation, self-deception, Social Desirability Scale, randomized response, bogus pipeline, self-administered questionnaire, bias detection, bias prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review