Cited by 20Psychometric Methodologies and TestingCognitive Abilities and TestingSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Black-white bias in ‘cultural’ and ‘noncultural’ test items

Jensen, Arthur R., McGurk, Frank C.J.·1987·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(87)90029-8

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generally, studies either did not identify biased items, or biased items only negligibly impacted overall test scores.

    “Generally, studies either did not identify biased items, or biased items only negligibly impacted overall test scores (e.g., Abad et al., 2004;Jensen & McGurk, 1987;Vanderpool & Catano, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, A. R., & McGurk, F. C. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
295-301
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138334525
Cited by
19
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
differential item functioning, cultural bias, black-white disparities, item difficulty, reasoning skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review