Day-to-day variation in energy and nutrient intake: evidence of individuality in eating behaviour?
Abstract
A study of within-subject variation in the reported food intakes and food selections of 29 adults participating in the Beltsville One-Year Dietary Intake Study suggests that individuals possess characteristics levels of day-to-day variation in intake. Application of Bartlett's test of homogeneity of variance indicated heterogeneity of within-subject variance in energy intake and in selected nutrients controlled for energy. Comparisons of estimates of within-subject variation derived from a split sample of days revealed the relative stability of individuals' magnitudes of day-to-day variation in energy and nutrient intake over time. For some nutrient variables, a large proportion of the observed heterogeneity in within-subject variation could be explained by a linear relationship between subjects' standard deviations and their mean intake levels. However, heterogeneity persisted when subjects' coefficients of variation were compared, suggesting that mean intake differences are insufficient to explain the observed differences in subjects' levels of day-to-day variation. The magnitude of observed variation in an individual's food intake and food selection from one day to the next appears to be a meaningful descriptor of that individual's intake behaviour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies found day-to-day variability in ad libitum energy intake with a standard deviation of about 500-600 kcal/d.
“This sample size calculation was informed by previous studies measuring day to day variability of ad libitum energy intake having a standard deviation of about 500–600 kcal/d (Bray et al., 2008; Edholm et al., 1970; Tarasuk and Beaton, 1992).”
From Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake (2019) · cites this paper as Tarasuk and Beaton, 1992
Cites
Thompson, F. E., Larkin, F. A., & Brown, M. B. (1986) · Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/s0271-5317(86)80006-9 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hall, K. D., Ayuketah, A., Brychta, R., Cai, H., Cassimatis, T., Chen, K. Y., Chung, S. T., Costa, E., Courville, A., Darcey, V., et al. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008 · Cited by 1,971 · see citing works
Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of under-reporting.
Macdiarmid, J., & Blundell, J. (1998) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr19980017 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Hall, K. D., Guo, J., Courville, A. B., Boring, J., Brychta, R., Chen, K. Y., Darcey, V., Forde, C. G., Gharib, A. M., Gallagher, I., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01209-1 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tarasuk, V., & Beaton, G. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Beaton, George H.
- ORCID
- Tarasuk, Valerie
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-54
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060737448
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Keywords
- day-to-day variability, energy intake, nutrient intake, within-person variability, individual differences, eating behaviour, food choice, heteroscedasticity, coefficient of variation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Energy Intake, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Diet Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review