Cited by 22Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The relationship between tangle and plaque formation during healthy aging and mild dementia

Price, Joseph L.·1993·Neurobiology of Aging

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(93)90062-g

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, J. L.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Price, Joseph L.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-11
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
661-663
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042430420
Cited by
22
References
2
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
tangles, plaque, neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid plaques, healthy aging, mild dementia, Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Humans, Middle Aged, Neurofibrillary Tangles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review