Cited by 52Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Alzheimer pathology of patients carrying apoliprotein E ε4 allele

Heinonen, O·1995·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

A recent report suggested that brains of Alzheimer patients homozygous for APOE epsilon 4 show increased amyloid pathology compared to APOE epsilon 3 homozygotes. We studied APOE allele frequencies in 73 AD patients and 38 controls. We also investigated relation of APOE genotypes to beta/A4 immunopositive plaques, cerebrovascular beta/A4 deposition, neurons expressing paired helical filaments (PHFs), and synaptophysin-like immunopositivity in 22 neuropathologically verified AD patients. We also correlated APOE genotypes of definite AD patients to beta/A4 immunoreactivity in dermal vessel walls detected in lifetime skin biopsy samples. APOE allele epsilon 4 frequency was increased in AD compared to nondemented controls (0.37 vs. 0.11; p = 0.006). The number of beta/A4 immunoreactive plaques, PHFs-containing neurons, the degree of cerebrovascular beta/A4 deposition or synaptophysin-like immunoreactivity did not differ significantly in AD patients with or without epsilon 4. beta/A4 deposition in dermal vessel walls was more frequent in definite AD patients with epsilon 4 (43%) than in patients without epsilon 4 (22%). However, the difference did not reach the statistical significance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(95)00076-q

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several subsequent studies reported conflicting findings on the relationship between plaque density and apoE ε4 allele dose.

    “However, several subsequent studies reported conflicting findings (Benjamin et al., 1995; Heinonen et al., 1995; Itoh and Yamada, 1996; Landen et al., 1996b).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Heinonen et al., 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinonen, O.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Heinonen, O
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
505-513
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067908285
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, APOE genotype, paired helical filaments, synaptophysin, genetic risk factors, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Apolipoproteins E, Blood Vessels, Brain, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Male, Neurons, Skin, Synapses, Chi-Square Distribution, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Synaptophysin, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review