The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain
Open accessAbstract
One important mechanical function of the lumbar spine is to support the upper body by transmitting compressive and shearing forces to the lower body during the performance of everyday activities. To enable the successful transmission of these forces, mechanical stability of the spinal system must be assured. The purpose of this study was to develop a method and to quantify the mechanical stability of the lumbar spine in vivo during various three-dimensional dynamic tasks. A lumbar spine model, one that is sensitive to the various ways that individuals utilize their muscles and ligaments, was used to estimate the lumbar spine stability index three times per second throughout the duration of each trial. Anatomically, this model included a rigid pelvis, ribcage, five vertebrae, 90 muscle fascicles and lumped parameter discs, ligaments and facets. The method consisted of three sub-models: a cross-bridge bond distribution-moment muscle model for estimating muscle force and stiffness from the electromyogram, a rigid link segment body model for estimating external forces and moments acting on the lumbar vertebrae, and an 18 degrees of freedom lumbar spine model for estimating moments produced by 90 muscle fascicles and lumped passive tissues. Individual muscle forces and their associated stiffness estimated from the EMG-assisted optimization algorithm, along with external forces were used for calculating the relative stability index of the lumbar spine for three subjects. It appears that there is an ample stability safety margin during tasks that demand a high muscular effort. However, lighter tasks present a potential hazard of spine buckling, especially if some reduction in passive joint stiffness is present. Several hypotheses on the mechanism of injury associated with low loads and aetiology of chronic back pain are presented in the context of lumbar spine stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hicks, G. E., Fritz, J. M., Delitto, A., & McGill, S. M. (2005) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.033 · Cited by 621
The biomechanics of low back injury: implications on current practice in industry and the clinic
McGill, S. M. (1997) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00172-8 · Cited by 472
Self-citationvan Dieën, J. H., Cholewicki, J., & Radebold, A. (2003) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000058939.51147.55 · Cited by 466
Self-citationKoumantakis, G. A., Watson, P. J., & Oldham, J. A. (2005) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/85.3.209 · Cited by 433
Intra-abdominal pressure increases stiffness of the lumbar spine
W Hodges, P., Martin Eriksson, A. E., Shirley, D., & C Gandevia, S. (2005) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.08.016 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Cholewicki, J., & McGill, S.
- Venue
- Clinical Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0268-0033 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979914684
- Cited by
- 1,092
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0268-0033(95)00035-6
- The paper
- Cholewicki, J., & McGill, S. (1996). Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clinical Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(95)00035-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.