Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: Who provides support

Open access
Seeman, Teresa E., Berkman, Lisa F.·1988·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The analyses presented here examine relationships between structural characteristics of social networks and two types of support (instrumental and emotional support) in a sample of community-dwelling individuals aged 65 and older. For each type of support, two dimensions are examined (1) the availability of such support and (2) the perceived adequacy of that support. Regression models, adjusting for age, sex, race and income show that structural characteristics such as total network size, number of face-to-face contacts and number of proximal ties are associated with greater availability of both instrumental and emotional support. The perceived adequacy of both types of support is most strongly related to the number of monthly face-to-face contacts. Comparisons of specific types of ties show that neither ones' spouse nor ones' children are primary sources of support. Rather the presence of a confidant is strongly associated with both dimensions of instrumental and emotional support; the presence of a spouse is not. And, while ties with children are most strongly related to aspects of instrumental support, ties with close friends and relatives are more strongly related to aspects of emotional support. Analyses of possible interactions show that for those without a spouse, confidants assume greater importance in providing emotional support. For those without children, ties with close friends and relatives assume a larger role relative to the perceived adequacy of both emotional and instrumental support.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90065-2

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Keith, 1983, Patterns of assistance among parents and the childless in very old age: implications for practice, J. Geront. Soc. Work, 6, 49, 10.1300/J083V06N01_05 · doi:10.1300/j083v06n01_05
  2. Thomas, 1985, Social bonds in a healthy elderly sample: characteristics and associated variables, Soc. Sci. Med., 20, 365, 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90011-5 · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(85)90011-5
  3. Coe, 1984, Complementary and compensatory functions in social network relationships among the elderly, The Gerontologist, 24, 396, 10.1093/geront/24.4.396 · doi:10.1093/geront/24.4.396
  4. Babchuk, 1965, Primary friends and kin: a study of the associations of middle class couples, Soc. Forces, 43, 483, 10.2307/2574454 · doi:10.2307/2574454

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Seeman, T. E., & Berkman, L. F.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
737-749
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034669036
Cited by
498
References
54
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: Who provides support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90065-2
The paper
Seeman, T. E., & Berkman, L. F. (1988). Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: Who provides support. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90065-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.