The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data
Abstract
Spirituality and religiousness are gaining increasing attention as health research variables. However, the particular aspects examined vary from study to study, ranging from church attendance to religious coping to meaning in life. This frequently results in a lack of clarity regarding what is being measured, the meaning of the relationships between health variables and spirituality, and implications for action. This article describes the Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES) and its development, reliability, exploratory factor analyses, and preliminary construct validity. Normative data from random samples and preliminary relationships of health-related data with the DSES also are included. Detailed data for the 16-item DSES are provided from two studies; a third study provided data on a subset of 6 items, and afourth study was done on the interrater reliability of the item subset. A 6-item version was used in the General Social Survey because of the need to shorten the measure for the survey. A rationale for the conceptual underpinnings and item selection is provided, as are suggested pathways for linkages to health and well-being. This scale addresses reported ordinary experiences of spirituality such as awe, joy that lifts one out of the mundane, and a sense of deep inner peace. Studies using the DSES may identify ways in which this element of life may influence emotion, cognition and behavior, and health or ways in which this element may be treated as an outcome in itself a particular component of well-being. The DSES evidenced good reliability across several studies with internal consistency estimates in the .90s. Preliminary evidence showed that daily spiritual experience is related to decreased total alcohol intake, improved quality of life, and positive psychosocial status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
DESCARTES' ERROR: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
Marg, E. (1995) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03988.x · Cited by 8,118
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature.
James, W. (1902) · doi:10.1037/10004-000 · Cited by 5,204
Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.5.4.432 · Cited by 4,533
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Rachel Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004 · Cited by 4,458
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness, Spirituality for Use in Health Research.A Report of a National Working Group Supported by the Fetzer Institute in Collaboration With the National Institute on Aging. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute, 1999.
- Bradley MB, Green NM, Jones DE, Lynn M, McNeil L:Churches and Church Membership in the United States: 1990. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Institute, 1992.
- Koenig H, Futterman A: Religion and Health Outcomes: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Methodological Approaches to the Study of Religion, Aging, and Health. Washington, DC: 1995.
- McGinn B: The letter and the spirit: Spirituality as an academic discipline.Christian Spirituality Bulletin. 1993,1(2):2–9.
- Bennett WJ: Neuroscience and the human spirit.National Review. 1998,50(25):32–35.
- Underhill E:Practical Mysticism. New York: Dutton, 1914.
- Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW: Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. In Peplau LA, Perlman D (eds),Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research, Research and Therapy. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1982, 224–237.
- Williams DR: Commitment. In Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research,A Report of a National Working Group Supported by the Fetzer Institute in Collaboration with the National Institute on Aging. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute, 1999, 72.
- Buber M:I and Thou (Kaufmann W, trans.). New York: Touchstone, 1996 (1937).
- De Wit H:Contemplative Psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne, 1991.
- Hanh TN:A Joyful Path: Community, Transformation and Peace. Berkeley, CA: Parallax, 1994.
- Merton T:Life & Holiness. New York: Doubleday, 1969.
- van Kaam A:Formation of the Human Heart (Formative Spirituality Series, Vol. 3). New York: Crossroads, 1991.
- van Kaam A:Fundamental Formation (Formative Spirituality Series, Vol. 1). New York: Crossroads, 1986.
- Vacek EC:Love, Human & Divine: The Heart of Christian Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1994.
- Brown J:The Self. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Cited by
Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis
Ano, G. G., & Vasconcelles, E. B. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20049 · Cited by 1,627
What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures
Strauss, C., Lever Taylor, B., Gu, J., Kuyken, W., Baer, R., Jones, F., & Cavanagh, K. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.004 · Cited by 1,021
A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model for the Care of Patients at the End of Life
Sulmasy, D. P. (2002) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/42.suppl_3.24 · Cited by 854
Concerns about measuring spirituality in research
Koenig, H. G. (2008) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e31816ff796 · Cited by 730
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Richards, B. D., Jesse, R., MacLean, K. A., Barrett, F. S., Cosimano, M. P., & Klinedinst, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881117731279 · Cited by 520
Metadata
- Authors
- Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A.
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-33
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W2096713430
- Cited by
- 1,207
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15324796abm2401_04
- The paper
- Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2401_04
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.