Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data

Underwood, Lynn G., Teresi, Jeanne A.·2002·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Spirituality and religiousness are gaining increasing attention as health research variables. However, the particular aspects examined vary from study to study, ranging from church attendance to religious coping to meaning in life. This frequently results in a lack of clarity regarding what is being measured, the meaning of the relationships between health variables and spirituality, and implications for action. This article describes the Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES) and its development, reliability, exploratory factor analyses, and preliminary construct validity. Normative data from random samples and preliminary relationships of health-related data with the DSES also are included. Detailed data for the 16-item DSES are provided from two studies; a third study provided data on a subset of 6 items, and afourth study was done on the interrater reliability of the item subset. A 6-item version was used in the General Social Survey because of the need to shorten the measure for the survey. A rationale for the conceptual underpinnings and item selection is provided, as are suggested pathways for linkages to health and well-being. This scale addresses reported ordinary experiences of spirituality such as awe, joy that lifts one out of the mundane, and a sense of deep inner peace. Studies using the DSES may identify ways in which this element of life may influence emotion, cognition and behavior, and health or ways in which this element may be treated as an outcome in itself a particular component of well-being. The DSES evidenced good reliability across several studies with internal consistency estimates in the .90s. Preliminary evidence showed that daily spiritual experience is related to decreased total alcohol intake, improved quality of life, and positive psychosocial status.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm2401_04

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness, Spirituality for Use in Health Research.A Report of a National Working Group Supported by the Fetzer Institute in Collaboration With the National Institute on Aging. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute, 1999.
  2. Bradley MB, Green NM, Jones DE, Lynn M, McNeil L:Churches and Church Membership in the United States: 1990. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Institute, 1992.
  3. Koenig H, Futterman A: Religion and Health Outcomes: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Methodological Approaches to the Study of Religion, Aging, and Health. Washington, DC: 1995.
  4. McGinn B: The letter and the spirit: Spirituality as an academic discipline.Christian Spirituality Bulletin. 1993,1(2):2–9.
  5. Bennett WJ: Neuroscience and the human spirit.National Review. 1998,50(25):32–35.
  6. Underhill E:Practical Mysticism. New York: Dutton, 1914.
  7. Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW: Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. In Peplau LA, Perlman D (eds),Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research, Research and Therapy. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1982, 224–237.
  8. Williams DR: Commitment. In Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research,A Report of a National Working Group Supported by the Fetzer Institute in Collaboration with the National Institute on Aging. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute, 1999, 72.
  9. Buber M:I and Thou (Kaufmann W, trans.). New York: Touchstone, 1996 (1937).
  10. De Wit H:Contemplative Psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne, 1991.
  11. Hanh TN:A Joyful Path: Community, Transformation and Peace. Berkeley, CA: Parallax, 1994.
  12. Merton T:Life & Holiness. New York: Doubleday, 1969.
  13. van Kaam A:Formation of the Human Heart (Formative Spirituality Series, Vol. 3). New York: Crossroads, 1991.
  14. van Kaam A:Fundamental Formation (Formative Spirituality Series, Vol. 1). New York: Crossroads, 1986.
  15. Vacek EC:Love, Human & Divine: The Heart of Christian Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1994.
  16. Brown J:The Self. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998.

Cited by

See all 1,207

Metadata

Authors
Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2002-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
22-33
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2096713430
Cited by
1,207
References
50
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15324796abm2401_04
The paper
Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2401_04

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.