Cited by 220Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Non-medical influences on medical decision-making

McKinlay, John B., Potter, Deborah A., Feldman, Henry A.·1996·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Background The influence of non-medical factors on physicians' decision-making has been documented in many observational studies, but rarely in an experimental setting capable of demonstrating cause and effect. We conducted a controlled factorial experiment to assess the influence of non-medical factors on the diagnostic and treatment decisions made by practitioners of internal medicine in two common medical situations. Method One hundred and ninety-two white male internists individually viewed professionally produced video scenarios in which the actor-patient, presenting with either chest pain or dyspnea, possessed various balanced combinations of sex, race, age, socioeconomic status, and health insurance coverage. Physician subjects were randomly drawn from lists of internists in private practice, hospital-based practice, and HMO's, at two levels of experience. Results The most frequent diagnoses for both chest pain and dyspnea were psychogenic origin and cardiac problems. Smoking cessation was the most frequent treatment recommendation for both conditions. Younger patients (all other factors being the same) were significantly more likely to receive the psychogenic diagnosis. Older patients were more likely to receive the cardiac diagnosis for chest pain, particularly if they were insured. HMO-based physicians were more likely to recommend a follow-up visit for chest pain. Several interactions of patient and physician factors were significant in addition to the main effects…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00342-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 220

Authors
McKinlay, J. B., Potter, D. A., & Feldman, H. A.
Affiliations
New England Research Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
McKinlay, John B.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-03
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
769-776
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991525577
Cited by
220
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl037762-02)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-37762)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
physician decision-making, non-medical factors, diagnostic bias, chest pain, dyspnea, patient age, health insurance, smoking cessation, internal medicine, social determinants of health, Bayesian inference
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Chest Pain, Decision Theory, Diagnosis, Dyspnea, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physician's Role, Therapeutics, Patient Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review