Psychosocial responses to oral and maxillofacial surgery for head and neck cancer
Abstract
This study involved extensive interviews with 28 patients who had disfiguring oral and maxillofacial surgery for head and neck cancer. The patients, ages 42 to 76 years, had all been informed of their diagnosis and were in 2- to 5-year postoperative follow-up. Findings pertain to how patients deal with the interpersonal and social ramifications of diagnosis and surgical treatment. Fatalism, delays in help-seeking, responses to diagnosis, postsurgical anxiety, and adjustment were reported. Reassurance prior to surgery was sometimes found to limit understanding of postoperative impairment. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons were seen in heroic or imposing roles that impacted on their capacity to be supportive to patients coping with life change and "handicap." The patient treatment decisions were found to be determined by attitudes about death, which motivated patients and surgeons to make difficult or extreme choices. Suffering, social changes, and postoperative uncertainty were patient concerns. Patient strategies for adjusting to disfiguration are examined, and specific recommendations for the oral and maxillofacial surgeon are made.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nearly 60% of those patients also reported feeling discounted or stigmatized because of their cancer-related appearance.
“Nearly 60% also reported feeling discounted or stigmatized because of their cancer-related appearance.”
From Multidimensional analysis of body image concerns among newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer (2010) · cites this paper as [15]
Strauss's retrospective study of oral and maxillofacial cancer surgery patients reported that all had considerable presurgical anxiety, with surgical mutilation a prominent fear.
“Strauss(15) conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving surgery for oral and maxillofacial cancer and reported that all patients had experienced considerable presurgical anxiety with surgical mutilation as a prominent fear.”
From Multidimensional analysis of body image concerns among newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer (2010) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,251 · see citing works
McNeil, B. J., Weichselbaum, R. W., & Pauker, S. G. (1981) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198110223051704 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Quality of life in treated head and neck cancer patients: A preliminary report
Morton, R. P., Davies, D. M., Baker, J., Baker, G. A., & Stell, P. M. (1984) · Clinical Otolaryngology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2273.1984.tb01493.x · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer?a review of the literature
Pruyn, J. F. A., JONG, P. C., Bosman, L. J., POPPEL, J. W. M. J., van den Borne, H. W., Ryckman, R. M., & MEIJ, K. (1986) · Clinical Otolaryngology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2273.1986.tb00153.x · Cited by 118 · see citing works
The quality of life of patients following treatment for laryngeal cancer
Harwood, A. R., & Rawlinson, E. (1983) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(83)90292-4 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Quality of Life and State of Health for Patients with Cancer in the Head and Neck
Drettner, B., & Ahlbom, A. (1983) · Acta Oto-Laryngologica · doi:10.3109/00016488309132903 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Psychosocial Implications of Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer
David, D. J., & Barritt, J. A. (1982) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(20)30322-9 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Cancer
(1973) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/107.1.194a · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The patient with cancer: social and clinical perspectives for the dentist
Strauss, R. P. (1988) · Special Care in Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1754-4505.1988.tb00714.x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation(2023) · doi:10.1093/med/9780198767824.003.0008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fingeret, M. C., Vidrine, D. J., Reece, G. P., Gillenwater, A. M., & Gritz, E. R. (2010) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.21181 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
- Authors
- Strauss, R. P.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Strauss, Ronald P.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-348
- ISSN
- 0278-2391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024152660
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (CA 17973-12)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Keywords
- head and neck cancer, maxillofacial surgery, psychosocial adjustment, disfigurement, fatalism, help-seeking delay, patient adaptation, attitudes toward death, surgeon-patient relationship, social impact of cancer
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Attitude to Death, Attitude to Health, Eye, Artificial, Fear, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Smoking, Sociology, Health Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review