The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies
Open accessAbstract
An analysis of the logic of valid inferences about the structure of normal cognitive processes from the study of impaired cognitive performance in brain-damaged patients is presented. The logic of inferences from group studies and single-case studies is compared. It is shown that given certain assumptions, only the single-case method allows valid inferences about the structure of cognitive systems from the analysis of impaired performance. It is also argued that although the single-case approach is not entirely problem-free, the difficulties encountered are relatively minor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia
Caramazza, A. (1984) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(84)90032-4 · Cited by 489
Self-citationStructures, or Why Things Don’t Fall Down
Gordon, J. E., & Stewart, M. B. (1980) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.12007 · Cited by 280
Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading
Coltheart, M. (1985) · Attention and performance · Cited by 208
Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90049-6 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Cited by
A computational neuroanatomy for motor control
Shadmehr, R., & Krakauer, J. W. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5 · Cited by 1,187
Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate.
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.628 · Cited by 785
Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia.
Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.98.1.74 · Cited by 655
What can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist?
Henson, R. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980443000502 · Cited by 327
Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overview
Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(91)90149-u · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Caramazza, A.
- Venue
- Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-66
- ISSN
- 0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978272474
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0278-2626(86)90061-8
- The paper
- Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. Brain and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(86)90061-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
