Cited by 325Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overview

Bates, Elizabeth, Wulfeck, Beverly, MacWhinney, Brian·1991·Brain and Language

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0093-934x(91)90149-u

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Blumstein, S. & Milberg, W. (1983, October). Automatic and controlled processing in speechlanguage deficits in aphasia. Symposium on Automatic Speech. Abstracts of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia , Minneapolis.
  2. Chen, S. (1989, April). On grammatical deficits in Chinese aphasia. Abstracts of the 18th Annual Linguistics Symposium . University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
  3. Friederici, A. (1986). Autonomy and automaticity: Accessing function words during sentence comprehension. In G. Denes, C. Semenza, P. Bisacchi & E. Andreewsky (Eds.), Perspectives in cognitive neuropsychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Kean, M.-L. (Ed.). (1985). Agrammatism . New York: Academic Press.
  5. MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.). (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing . New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Menn, L. & Obler, L.K. (Eds.). (1990). Agrammatic aphasia: Cross-language narrative sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  7. Rumelhart D. & McClelland J.L.(Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Seidenberg, M., McClelland, J., & Patterson, K. (1987, July). A distributed developmental model of visual word recognition, naming and dyslexia. Symposium on Connectionism. Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Experimental Psychological Society (U.K.) . Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Bates, Elizabeth
Venue
Brain and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-08
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
123-148
ISSN
0093-934X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021242263
Cited by
325
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 62
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
aphasia, cross-linguistic comparison, language specificity, neuroplasticity, behavioral plasticity, language processing, neural mechanisms of language
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Broca, Aphasia, Wernicke, Cerebral Cortex, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Dominance, Cerebral, Humans, Language, Neuronal Plasticity, Phonetics, Semantics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review