The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Putting shakertown back together: Critical theory in archaeology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Critical theory has been little used in archaeology, despite its exceptional ability to understand social relations and circumstances, both past and present.”
From Localized Critical Theory as an Expression of Community Archaeology Practice: with an Example from Inuvialuit Elders of the Canadian Western Arctic (2014) · cites this paper as Wylie 1985
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- David, 1976, The Popper-Adorno controversy: The methodological dispute in German sociology, Philosophy of Social Science, 2, 105
- Jurgen, 1973, A postscript to Knowledge and human interests, Philosophy of Social Science, 3, 157, 10.1177/004839317300300111 · DOI
- Kelley, Jane H., and Marsha P. Hanen h.d. Archaeology and the methodology of science. Academic Press, Toronto, in preparation.
- Kohl, 1981, Materialist approaches in prehistory, Annual Review of Anthropolgy, 10, 89, 10.1146/annurev.an.10.100181.000513 · DOI
- Leone, 1981, The relationship between artifacts and the public in outdoor history museums, Annals of the New York Academy of the Sciences, 376, 301, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb28174.x · DOI
- Miller, 1980, Archaeology and development, Current Anthropology, 21, 709, 10.1086/202567 · DOI
- Alison, 1982, An analogy by any other name is just as analogical: A commentary on the Gould-Watson dialogue, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 382, 10.1016/0278-4165(82)90003-4 · DOI
- Alison, 1985, The reaction against analogy, Vol. 8, 63
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Community archaeology: general methods and standards of practice
Tully, G. (2007) · Public Archaeology · doi:10.1179/175355307x243645 · Cited by 153
“Power to the people”: Sociopolitics and the archaeology of black Americans
Franklin, M. (1997) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/bf03374229 · Cited by 96
McDavid, C. (1997) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/bf03374235 · Cited by 88
Flewellen, A. O., Odewale, A., Dunnavant, J., Jones, A., & White, W. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00600-z · Cited by 43
McDavid, C., & Brock, T. P. (2015) · Ethics and Archaeological Praxis · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_11 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Wylie, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-147
- ISSN
- 0278-4165
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
