The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: Implications for archaeology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Estos resultados sugieren pocas variaciones en el consumo de un bien empleado comúnmente como marcador de riqueza.
“Estos resultados sugieren pocas variaciones en el consumo de un bien empleado comúnmente como marcador de riqueza (Smith 1987).”
From Desigualdades sociales, producción y consumo en unidades domésticas prehispánicas en el valle de popayán, colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Smith 1987
Debido a que es difícil encontrar elementos de lujo entre los desechos de las viviendas, la proporción de desechos de bienes foráneos y de fragmentos cerámicos decorados es una mejor forma de evaluar las diferencias económicas de una comunidad.
“Evidentemente, es difícil encontrar elementos de lujo entre los desechos de las viviendas (a menos que estas hayan sido abruptamente abandonadas y sepultadas), por lo que la proporción de desechos de bienes foráneos y de fragmentos cerámicos decorados es una mejor forma de evaluar las diferencias económicas de una comunidad (Smith 1987).”
From Desigualdades sociales, producción y consumo en unidades domésticas prehispánicas en el valle de popayán, colombia (2023) · cites this paper as Smith 1987
Citations
Cites
Introduction: commodities and the politics of value
Appadurai, A. (1986) · The Social Life of Things · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819582.003 · Cited by 4,001 · cited 2×
“Useful theoretical discussions of luxuries and their relationship to wealth and other social factors are found in Douglas and Isherwood (1979), Braudel (1981), and Appadurai (1986).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Bartel, 1983, A historical review of ethnographic and archaeological analyses of mortuary practice, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 32, 10.1016/0278-4165(82)90007-1 · DOI
- Bawden, 1982, Community organization reflected by the household: A study of Precolumbian social dynamics, Journal of Field Archaeology, 9, 165, 10.1179/009346982791504760 · DOI
- Belcher, 1972, A cross-cultural household level-of-living scale, Rural Sociology, 37, 208
- Belcher, 1952, A short scale for measuring farm family level of living, Oklahoma Agricultural Experimental Station Technical Bulletin
- Belk, 1983, Wordly possessions: Issues and criticisms, Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 514
- Blanton, 1984, The Mesoamerican world system, American Anthropologist, 86, 673, 10.1525/aa.1984.86.3.02a00100 · DOI
- Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. n.d. Elite and utilitarian crafts in the Aztec state. In Production, exchange, and complex societies, edited by Elizabeth M. Brumfiel and Timothy K. Earle. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, in press.
- Castro, 1981, Indicators of rural inequality, World Development, 9, 401, 10.1016/0305-750X(81)90035-8 · DOI
- Cohen, 1978, Ethnicity: Problem and focus in anthropology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 7, 379, 10.1146/annurev.an.07.100178.002115 · DOI
- D'Altroy, 1985, Staple finance, wealth finance, and storage in the Inka political economy, Current Anthropology, 26, 187, 10.1086/203249 · DOI · Paper page
- Davis, 1945, Some principles of stratification, American Sociological Review, 10, 242, 10.2307/2085643 · DOI
- Drennan, 1983, Comment on Kowalewski and Finsten (1983), Current Anthropology, 24, 429
- Drennan, 1984, Long-distance movement of goods in the Mesoamerican Formative and Classic, American Antiquity, 49, 27, 10.2307/280510 · DOI
- Feinman, 1981, The production step measure: An ordinal index of labor input in ceramic manufacture, American Antiquity, 46, 871, 10.2307/280113 · DOI
- Friedl, 1964, Lagging emulation in post-peasant society, American Anthropologist, 66, 569, 10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00040 · DOI
- Griffiths, 1978, Use-marks on historic ceramics: A preliminary study, Historical Archaeology, 12, 68, 10.1007/BF03373441 · DOI
- Gross, 1984, Time allocation: A tool for the study of cultural behavior, Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 519, 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002511 · DOI
- Guttman, 1942, A revision of Chapin's social status scale, American Sociological Review, 7, 362, 10.2307/2085365 · DOI
- Haller, 1970, Changes in the structure of status systems, Rural Sociology, 35, 469
- Hally, 1986, The identification of vessel function: A case study from northwest Georgia, American Antiquity, 51, 267, 10.2307/279940 · DOI
- Haviland, 1967, Stature at Tikal, Guatemala: Implications for Classic Maya demography and social organization, American Antiquity, 32, 316, 10.2307/2694660 · DOI
- Hayden, 1983, Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2, 117, 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7 · DOI
- Hayden, 1984, The structure of material systems: Ethnoarchaeology in the Maya Highlands, Society for American Archaeology, Papers
- Huss-Ashmore, 1982, Nutritional inference from paleopathology, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 395, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003105-4.50014-5 · DOI
- Kay, 1964, A Guttman scale model of Tahitian consumer behavior, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 20, 160, 10.1086/soutjanth.20.2.3629324 · DOI
- Kintigh, 1984, Measuring archaeological diversity by comparison with simulated assemblages, American Antiquity, 49, 44, 10.2307/280511 · DOI
- Klepinger, 1984, Nutritional assessment from bone, Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 75, 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.000451 · DOI
- Kowalewski, 1983, The economic systems of ancient Oaxaca: A regional perspective, Current Anthropology, 24, 413, 10.1086/203028 · DOI
- Lewis, 1969, The Possessions of the poor, Scientific American, 221, 114, 10.1038/scientificamerican1069-114 · DOI
- Mack, 1951, Housing as an index of social class, Social Forces, 29, 391, 10.2307/2572716 · DOI
- McGuire, 1982, The study of ethnicity in historical archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 152, 10.1016/0278-4165(82)90019-8 · DOI
- McGuire, 1983, Breaking down cultural complexity: Inequality and heterogeneity, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 6, 91, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003106-1.50008-0 · DOI
- Miller, 1980, Classification and economic scaling of 19th century ceramics, Historical Archaeology, 14, 1, 10.1007/BF03373454 · DOI
- Mintz, 1973, A note on the definition of peasantries, Journal of Peasant Studies, 1, 91, 10.1080/03066157308437874 · DOI
- Nelson, 1981, Ethnoarchaeology and paleodemography: A test of Turner and Lofgren's hypothesis, Journal of Anthropological Research, 37, 107, 10.1086/jar.37.2.3629704 · DOI
- Netting, 1982, Some home truths on household size and wealth, American Behavioral Scientists, 25, 641, 10.1177/000276482025006004 · DOI
- O'Laughlin, 1975, Marxist approaches in anthropology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 341, 10.1146/annurev.an.04.100175.002013 · DOI
- Phillips, 1984, El Proyecto Basura, American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 139, 10.1177/000276484028001011 · DOI
- Rathje, 1982, Rich men … poor men, American Behavioral Scientist, 25, 705, 10.1177/000276482025006008 · DOI
- Rice, 1983, Serpents and styles of Peten Postclassic pottery, American Anthropologist, 85, 866, 10.1525/aa.1983.85.4.02a00080 · DOI
- Schiffer, 1983, Toward the identification of formation processes, American Antiquity, 48, 675, 10.2307/279771 · DOI
- Smith, 1986, The role of social stratification in the Aztec empire: A view from the provinces, American Anthropologist, 88, 70, 10.1525/aa.1986.88.1.02a00050 · DOI
- Smith, 1980, Waves of influence in Postclassic Mesoamerica? A critique of the Mixteca-Puebla concept, Anthropology, 4, 15
- Teller, 1968, Ceramics in Providence, 1750–1800: An inventory survey, Antiques, 94, 570
- Wilk, 1983, Little house in the jungle: The causes of variation in house size among modern Kekchi Maya, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2, 99, 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90009-0 · DOI
- Yanagisako, 1979, Family and household: The analysis of domestic groups, Annual Review of Anthropology, 8, 161, 10.1146/annurev.an.08.100179.001113 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kahn, J. G., Sinton, J., Mills, P. R., & Lundblad, S. P. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.003 · Cited by 37
Rural Cuzco before and after Inka Imperial Conquest: Foodways, Status, and Identity (Maras, Peru)
Quave, K. E., Kennedy, S. A., & Alan Covey, R. (2019) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-018-0483-0 · Cited by 12
Giraldo Tenorio, H. J., Díaz Astaiza, M. F., & Corrales Otero, G. A. (2023) · Revista Colombiana De Antropología · doi:10.22380/2539472x.2364
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-335
- ISSN
- 0278-4165
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review