The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An assessment of several of the historically most influential theoretical models used in ecology and of the data provided in their support
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Platt, J. R. (1964) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.146.3642.347 · Cited by 2,907
Cited by
From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology
Wu, J., & Loucks, O. L. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/419172 · Cited by 1,246
Are marine reserves effective in management of reef fisheries?
Roberts, C. M., & Polunin, N. V. C. (1991) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/bf00042662 · Cited by 469
POPULATION GROWTH IN SPACE AND TIME: SPATIAL LOGISTIC EQUATIONS
Law, R., Murrell, D. J., & Dieckmann, U. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0252:pgisat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 366
Soil carbon dynamics after forest harvest: An ecosystem paradigm reconsidered
Yanai, R. D., Currie, W. S., & Goodale, C. L. (2003) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-002-0206-5 · Cited by 318
Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling
Peck, S. L. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.019 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, C. A. S.
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 5-31
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140827410
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An assessment of several of the historically most influential theoretical models used in ecology and of the data provided in their support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3800(88)90070-1
- The paper
- Hall, C. A. S. (1988). An assessment of several of the historically most influential theoretical models used in ecology and of the data provided in their support. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(88)90070-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
