The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Can unobserved land quality explain the inverse productivity relationship?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The state of family farms in the world
Graeub, B. E., Chappell, M. J., Wittman, H., Ledermann, S., Kerr, R. B., & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012 · Cited by 543
Food security and biodiversity: can we have both? An agroecological analysis
Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4 · Cited by 474
The Evolution of the World Bank's Land Policy: Principles, Experience, and Future Challenges
Deinlnger, K., & Binswanger, H. (1999) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/14.2.247 · Cited by 444
On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship
Barrett, C. B. (1996) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(96)00412-9 · Cited by 408
Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity–Size Relationship
Barrett, C. B., Bellemare, M. F., & Hou, J. Y. (2010) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.002 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Benjamin, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Development Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-84
- ISSN
- 0304-3878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048898668
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can unobserved land quality explain the inverse productivity relationship? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3878(94)00048-h
- The paper
- Benjamin, D. (1995). Can unobserved land quality explain the inverse productivity relationship? Journal of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(94)00048-h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
