The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity–Size Relationship
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brown, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532174 · Cited by 8,176
Peasant Household Behaviour with Missing Markets: Some Paradoxes Explained
de Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., & Sadoulet, E. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234892 · Cited by 1,439
The Theory of Peasant Economy.
Dobb, M., Chayanov, A. V., Thorner, D., Kerblay, B., & Smith, R. E. F. (1968) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2229509 · Cited by 1,439
Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household
Udry, C. (1996) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/262050 · Cited by 1,261
Development of Reflectance Spectral Libraries for Characterization of Soil Properties
Shepherd, K. D., & Walsh, M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.0988 · Cited by 1,025
Micro-Level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, J. O., & Lanjouw, P. (2003) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00399 · Cited by 930
Peasants and Dualism with or without Surplus Labor
Sen, A. K. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259198 · Cited by 706
The relation between farm size and farm productivity
Feder, G. (1985) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3878(85)90059-8 · Cited by 613
Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries
Crosson, P., Berry, R. A., & Cline, W. R. (1980) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146229 · Cited by 409
On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship
Barrett, C. B. (1996) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(96)00412-9 · Cited by 408
Self-citation
Cited by
Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification
Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T. C., Jackson, L., Motzke, I., Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J., & Whitbread, A. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068 · Cited by 2,066
The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide
Lowder, S. K., Skoet, J., & Raney, T. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041 · Cited by 2,012
Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010 · Cited by 594
“Consistent with the findings of Barrett et al. (2010), the striking withinhousehold inverse relationship raises novel puzzles about farmers’ behaviors and the input productivity implications that have yet to draw much research attention.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe state of family farms in the world
Graeub, B. E., Chappell, M. J., Wittman, H., Ledermann, S., Kerr, R. B., & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012 · Cited by 543
The impact of farm size on agricultural sustainability
Ren, C., Liu, S., van Grinsven, H., Reis, S., Jin, S., Liu, H., & Gu, B. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.151 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrett, C. B., Bellemare, M. F., & Hou, J. Y.
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-97
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022422271
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity–Size Relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.002
- The paper
- Barrett, C. B., Bellemare, M. F., & Hou, J. Y. (2010). Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity–Size Relationship. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
