The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Government spending, interest rates, prices, and budget deficits in the United Kingdom, 1701–1918
Open accessAbstract
The British data from the early 1700s through WWI provide an unmatched opportunity for studying temporary changes in government purchases. Temporary increases, which appeared mainly as wartime spending, raised long-term interest rates, but significantly increased the growth rates of money and prices only during suspensions of the gold standard (1797–1821 and 1914–1918). Temporary changes in military spending accounted for the bulk of budget deficits; over the sample of more than 200 years, I found only two major non-war deficits — one associated with compensation payments to slaveowners in 1835–1936 and the other with a dispute over the income tax in 1909–1910. Interest rates did not react much to these ‘exogenous’ deficits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050700009451 · Cited by 5,300
Fiscal Discipline and the Cost of Public Debt Service: Some Estimates for OECD Countries
Ardagna, S., Caselli, F., & Lane, T. (2007) · The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics · doi:10.2202/1935-1690.1417 · Cited by 267
(2011) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Barro, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Monetary Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-247
- ISSN
- 0304-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122324726
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
