The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The multidimensional nature of cancer-related pain
Abstract
A critical review of the literature examining the assessment of cancer-related pain revealed a lack of systematic research. In the present study, 40 patients with cancer-related pain were compared to 37 pain-free cancer patients matched on diagnosis, stage of disease, age, sex, and inpatient vs. outpatient status. The results supported a multidimensional conceptualization of cancer-related pain consisting of sensory, affective, cognitive, and behavioral components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Long-term opioid therapy: Assessment of consequences and risks
Savage, S. R. (1996) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/0885-3924(95)00202-2 · Cited by 176
Acceptance of pain: A study in patients with advanced cancer
Gauthier, L. R., Rodin, G., Zimmermann, C., Warr, D., Moore, M., Shepherd, F., & Gagliese, L. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.009 · Cited by 61
Badr, H., & Shen, M. J. (2014) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000058 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahles, T. A., Blanchard, E. B., & Ruckdeschel, J. C.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-288
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085240198
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
