The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain
Abstract
Visual analogue scales (VAS) of sensory intensity and affective magnitude were validated as ratio scale measures for both chronic and experimental pain. Chronic pain patients and healthy volunteers made VAS sensory and affective responses to 6 noxious thermal stimuli (43, 45, 47, 48, 49 and 51 degrees C) applied for 5 sec to the forearm by a contact thermode. Sensory VAS and affective VAS responses to these temperatures yielded power functions with exponents 2.1 and 3.8, respectively; these functions were similar for pain patients and for volunteers. The power functions were predictive of estimated ratios of sensation or affect produced by pairs of standard temperatures (e.g. 47 and 49 degrees C), thereby providing direct evidence for ratio scaling properties of VAS. Vas sensory intensity responses to experimental pain, VAS sensory intensity responses to different levels of chronic pain, and direct temperature (experimental pain) matches to 3 levels of chronic pain were all internally consistent, thereby demonstrating the valid use of VAS for the measurement of and comparison between chronic pain and experimental heat pain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pain reports have served as the gold standard measure of pain in clinical settings and experimental studies [64],[65],[78].”
From Distinct Brain Systems Mediate the Effects of Nociceptive Input and Self-Regulation on Pain (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
Citations
Cites
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,873
HUSKISSON, E. C. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8 · Cited by 4,533
Graphic representation of pain
Scott, J., & Huskisson, E. C. (1976) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(76)90113-5 · Cited by 2,706
Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects
Stevens, S. S. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,507
Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects
Teghtsoonian, R., Stevens, S. S., & Stevens, G. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421904 · Cited by 1,325
The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain
REVILL, S. I., ROBINSON, J. O., Rosen, M. A., & Hogg, M. (1976) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x · Cited by 1,257
Melzack, R., & Torgerson, W. S. (1971) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-197101000-00017 · Cited by 930
Ohnhaus, E. E., & Adler, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5 · Cited by 797
The Neural Basis of Oral and Facial Function
Dubner, R. A., Sessle, B. J., & Storey, A. T. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1682-5 · Cited by 587
Melzack, R. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 573
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Beery, 1972, Measurement of Pain, J. clin. Trials, 9, 13
- 1979, Vol. 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,472
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008*
Bousquet, J., Khaltaev, N., Cruz, A. A., Denburg, J., Fokkens, W. J., Togias, A., Zuberbier, T., Baena‐Cagnani, C. E., Canonica, G. W., Van Weel, C., et al. (2008) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01620.x · Cited by 4,729
Self-citationPain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales
Williamson, A., & Hoggart, B. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x · Cited by 3,083
Bruera, E. D., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991) · Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.1177/082585979100700202 · Cited by 2,686
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McGrath, Patricia A.
- ORCID
- Price, Donald D.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1983-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-56
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994143652
- Cited by
- 3,921
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 177 · 2025: 195 · 2024: 186 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 238 · 2019: 158 · 2018: 152 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 154 · 2015: 167 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 141
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- visual analogue scale, chronic pain, experimental pain, thermal pain, sensory intensity, affective pain, power function, pain measurement validity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Aged, Back Pain, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Sensory Thresholds, Sick Role, Acupuncture Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
