The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer
Abstract
A hand-held pressure algometer with a pressure sensitive strain gauge at the tip was used to measure the pressure-pain threshold (PPT) in the temporal region of healthy volunteers. Various sizes of circular tips and various application rates were tested before selecting an area of 0.5 cm2 and a constant application rate of 0.68 N X sec-1 for future use. A highly significant correlation was found between PPT values obtained from the two sides (of the head) (P less than 0.001) and between PPT values obtained with a 3-week interval (P less than 0.001). In a series of 50 immediate consecutive measurements in the same individual, the mean PPT was 171 kPa (N = 6, 2 S.D. 24%). The mean relative change in PPT after a 3-week interval was 0 +/- 51% (N = 11, 2 S.D.). In the course of 5 repeated determinations at weekly intervals there was a significant increase in PPT (ANOVA, P less than 0.05). Subcutaneous lignocaine significantly elevated PPT compared to placebo. Due to the high inter-individual variation, determinations of PPT for group comparisons should include rather large population samples, whereas in paired studies, the intra-individual variation allows the investigation of much smaller groups (10-20 subjects). It is our experience that the pressure algometer is easy to operate in the hands of a skilled laboratory assistant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
(1977) · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10517-x · Cited by 2,457
Cited by
An electronic pressure-meter nociception paw test for mice
Cunha, T. M., Verri Jr., W. A., Vivancos, G. G., Moreira, I. F., Reis, S., Parada, C. A., Cunha, F. Q., & Ferreira, S. H. (2004) · Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research · doi:10.1590/s0100-879x2004000300018 · Cited by 459
Clauw, D. J. (2009) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.006 · Cited by 350
Sensory dysfunction in fibromyalgia patients with implications for pathogenic mechanisms
Kosek, E., Ekholm, J., & Hansson, P. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03188-0 · Cited by 348
Central sensitization in fibromyalgia and other musculoskeletal disorders
Arendt-Nielsen, L., & Graven-Nielsen, T. (2003) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-003-0034-0 · Cited by 219
Reliability of pain threshold measurement in young adults
Cathcart, S., & Pritchard, D. (2006) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1007/s10194-006-0265-7 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, K., Andersen, H. Ø., Olesen, J., & Lindblom, U.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-323
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073594722
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(86)90235-6
- The paper
- Jensen, K., Andersen, H. Ø., Olesen, J., & Lindblom, U. (1986). Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(86)90235-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.