The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tender points in fibromyalgia
Abstract
To establish inter-rater and test-retest reliability of use of a pressure algometer, 5 males and 5 females suffering from chronic fibromyalgia ('fibrositis'), and a normal group of 5 males and 5 females, were examined 2 times by each of 2 independent examiners, using 1 kg/sec rate of application, over 10 paired and typical 'tender points,' localized by skin marker. Tenderness thresholds of tender points were coded and analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, for factors sex, normal/fibromyalgia, and side, rater, and time 1/time 2. There was significantly lower tenderness thresholds of tender points in fibromyalgia compared to normal subjects. Generalizability coefficients were calculated and showed high inter-rater (0.85), and test-retest (0.85) reliability. Highly significant differences were found between specific tender points. A further 10 normals and 10 fibromyalgia subjects were then examined for 5 paired tender points and 5 paired non-tender points. A 2-way ANOVA was conducted for summed and averaged scores for all tender and non-tender points, with factors normal/fibromyalgia and tender/non-tender; again, there was a large difference between normal and fibromyalgia subjects, and between tender and non-tender points. The interaction was small but significant, but there was a larger difference between fibromyalgia and normal subjects observed on non-tender points. The low tenderness threshold observed at the tender points of fibromyalgia patients may reflect a more generalized lowering of tenderness thresholds, seen at non-tender points as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary fibromyalgia (fibrositis): Clinical study of 50 patients with matched normal controls
Yunus, M., Masi, A. T., Calabro, J. J., Miller, K. A., & Feigenbaum, S. L. (1981) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/0049-0172(81)90096-2 · Cited by 910
THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†
Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963) · British Journal of Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x · Cited by 737
Cited by
2016 revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria
Wolfe, F., Clauw, D. J., Fitzcharles, M.-A., Goldenberg, D. L., Häuser, W., Katz, R. L., Mease, P. J., Russell, A. S., Russell, I. J., & Walitt, B. (2016) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012 · Cited by 2,232
Unilateral intramuscular injections of acidic saline produce a bilateral, long-lasting hyperalgesia
Sluka, K. A., Kalra, A., & Moore, S. A. (2001) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/1097-4598(200101)24:1<37::aid-mus4>3.0.co;2-8 · Cited by 503
Generalized hypervigilance in fibromyalgia: evidence of perceptual amplification
McDermid, A. J., Rollman, G. B., & McCain, G. A. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)03059-x · Cited by 371
Sensory dysfunction in fibromyalgia patients with implications for pathogenic mechanisms
Kosek, E., Ekholm, J., & Hansson, P. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03188-0 · Cited by 348
Gibson, S. J., Littlejohn, G. O., Gorman, M. M., Helme, R. D., & Granges, G. (1994) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90198-8 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Tunks, E., Crook, J., Norman, G., & Kalaher, S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-19
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083698221
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tender points in fibromyalgia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90176-5
- The paper
- Tunks, E., Crook, J., Norman, G., & Kalaher, S. (1988). Tender points in fibromyalgia. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90176-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.