The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dose-dependent pain and mechanical hyperalgesia in humans after intradermal injection of capsaicin
Abstract
Psychophysical measurements of pain and mechanical hyperalgesia were obtained following different doses of capsaicin injected intradermally into the forearms of human subjects. Each subject received a 10 microliter injection of the vehicle and capsaicin doses of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 micrograms. The relationship between capsaicin dose and the magnitude and duration of pain was determined using the method of magnitude estimation. In addition to pain, capsaicin produced a flare and mechanical hyperalgesia. The area of flare and the area and time course of mechanical hyperalgesia were measured as a function of the dose of capsaicin. The magnitude and duration of pain, based on averaged responses of all subjects, increased as a negatively accelerating function of dose. The lowest dose of capsaicin to produce more pain than the vehicle was 0.1 micrograms. The area and duration of mechanical hyperalgesia also increased as a negatively accelerating function of dose. The lowest dose of capsaicin to produce an area of mechanical hyperalgesia was 0.1 micrograms. An area of hyperalgesia was present within seconds following injection. For doses of 10 and 100 micrograms, the area of hyperalgesia grew to reach a maximum within 5 and 7 min following the injection and gradually decreased, disappearing within 15 and 137 min, respectively. Capsaicin doses of 1, 10 and 100 micrograms produced successively greater areas of flare. The results demonstrate that humans can scale the magnitude of pain produced by capsaicin in a dose-dependent fashion. Further, the duration of pain, the area and duration of mechanical hyperalgesia, and the area of flare are dose-dependent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
Vanilloid (Capsaicin) Receptors and Mechanisms
Szallasi, A., & Blumberg, P. M. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01403-0 · Cited by 1,903
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Hwang, S. W., Cho, H., Kwak, J., Lee, S.-Y., Kang, C.-J., Jung, J., Cho, S., Min, K. H., Suh, Y.-G., Kim, D., et al. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.11.6155 · Cited by 1,048
Neurogenic hyperalgesia: psychophysical studies of underlying mechanisms
LaMotte, R. H., Shain, C. N., Simone, D. A., & Tsai, E. F. (1991) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1991.66.1.190 · Cited by 937
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Simone, D. A., Baumann, T. K., & LaMotte, R. H.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-107
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079312738
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose-dependent pain and mechanical hyperalgesia in humans after intradermal injection of capsaicin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90079-1
- The paper
- Simone, D. A., Baumann, T. K., & LaMotte, R. H. (1989). Dose-dependent pain and mechanical hyperalgesia in humans after intradermal injection of capsaicin. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90079-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.