Cited by 1,774Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentIon Channels and Receptors

The induction of pain: an integrative review

Millan, Mark J.·1999·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

The highly disagreeable sensation of pain results from an extraordinarily complex and interactive series of mechanisms integrated at all levels of the neuroaxis, from the periphery, via the dorsal horn to higher cerebral structures. Pain is usually elicited by the activation of specific nociceptors ('nociceptive pain'). However, it may also result from injury to sensory fibres, or from damage to the CNS itself ('neuropathic pain'). Although acute and subchronic, nociceptive pain fulfils a warning role, chronic and/or severe nociceptive and neuropathic pain is maladaptive. Recent years have seen a progressive unravelling of the neuroanatomical circuits and cellular mechanisms underlying the induction of pain. In addition to familiar inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and bradykinin, potentially-important, pronociceptive roles have been proposed for a variety of 'exotic' species, including protons, ATP, cytokines, neurotrophins (growth factors) and nitric oxide. Further, both in the periphery and in the CNS, non-neuronal glial and immunecompetent cells have been shown to play a modulatory role in the response to inflammation and injury, and in processes modifying nociception. In the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, wherein the primary processing of nociceptive information occurs, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are activated by glutamate released from nocisponsive afferent fibres. Their activation plays a key role in the induction of neuronal sensitization, a process underlying prolonged painful states. In addition, upon peripheral nerve injury, a reduction of inhibitory interneurone tone in the dorsal horn exacerbates sensitized states and further enhance nociception. As concerns the transfer of nociceptive information to the brain, several pathways other than the classical spinothalamic tract are of importance: for example, the postsynaptic dorsal column pathway. In discussing the roles of supraspinal structures in pain sensation, differences between its 'discriminative-sensory' and 'affective-cognitive' dimensions should be emphasized. The purpose of the present article is to provide a global account of mechanisms involved in the induction of pain. Particular attention is focused on cellular aspects and on the consequences of peripheral nerve injury. In the first part of the review, neuronal pathways for the transmission of nociceptive information from peripheral nerve terminals to the dorsal horn, and therefrom to higher centres, are outlined. This neuronal framework is then exploited for a consideration of peripheral, spinal and supraspinal mechanisms involved in the induction of pain by stimulation of peripheral nociceptors, by peripheral nerve injury and by damage to the CNS itself. Finally, a hypothesis is forwarded that neurotrophins may play an important role in central, adaptive mechanisms modulating nociception. An improved understanding of the origins of pain should facilitate the development of novel strategies for its more effective treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3

Cites

1977 of 1977 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The periaqueductal gray receives monosynaptic inputs from nociceptive spinal projection neurons and top-down projections from ventromedial prefrontal cortex, positioning it as a potential comparator of bottom-up aversive sensations with expectations.

    “The PAG receives monosynaptic inputs from both nociceptive spinal projection neurons28 and top-down projections from the vmPFC30, positioning it as a potential comparator of ‘bottom up’ aversive sensations with expectations.”
  • In the final dynamic causal model, noxious input had direct effects on periaqueductal gray and modulatory effects on ascending putamen-to-orbitofrontal, putamen-to-anterior-mid-cingulate, and midbrain-to-anterior-mid-cingulate connections.

    “Noxious input had direct effects on PAG, in keeping with the known anatomy of the ascending spinomesencephalic nociceptive pathway28, and modulatory effects on ascending putamen-to-OFC, putamen-to-aMCC, and midbrain-to-aMCC connections.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millan, M. J.
Affiliations
Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Millan, Mark J.
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
1-164
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123258170
Cited by
1,774
References
1,977
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 93
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
pain induction, nociception, nociceptors, neuropathic pain, dorsal horn, NMDA receptor, neuronal sensitization, peripheral nerve injury, ATP, cytokines, nitric oxide, neurotrophins, glial modulation, dorsal column pathway, spinothalamic tract, affective pain
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Nociceptors, Pain, Spinal Cord

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review