The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury pain
Abstract
Chronic pain is a problem among patients with spinal cord injuries, but the psychosocial factors associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) pain are not well understood. To understand SCI pain further, 54 patients (19 with quadriplegia and 35 with paraplegia) completed the Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Profile of Mood States, Acceptance of Disability Scale and SCI Interference Scale. Forty-two patients stated they had SCI pain and completed the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and the Pain Experience Scale. Results revealed that anger and negative cognitions were associated with greater pain severity. Patients who reported pain in response to a general prompt experienced more severe pain than patients who reported pain only when directly questioned about the presence of pain, but these different reporting groups did not differ on emotional variables. Those who were less accepting of their disability reported greater pain severity. Additionally, patients who perceived a significant other expressing punishing responses (e.g., expressing anger at the patients or ignoring the patients) to their pain behaviors reported more severe pain. Level of lesion, completeness of injury, surgical fusion and/or instrumentation and veteran status were not associated with pain severity. Finally, pain was associated with emotional distress over and above the distress associated with the SCI itself. Overall, psychosocial factors, not physiological factors, were most closely associated with the experience of pain. Multidimensional aspects of pain are used to explain these findings and suggest that treatment should be directed at the emotional and cognitive sequelae of chronic SCI pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)
Kerns, R. D., Turk, D. C., & Rudy, T. E. (1985) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1 · Cited by 2,128
Cited by
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method
McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012 · Cited by 1,101
Siddall, P. J., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00452-9 · Cited by 964
Beyond unfavorable thinking: the illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases
Evers, A. W. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., van Lankveld, W., Jongen, P. J. H., Jacobs, J. W. G., & Bijlsma, J. W. J. (2001) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.69.6.1026 · Cited by 657
Turner, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Warms, C. A., & Cardenas, D. D. (2002) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00045-3 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Summers, J. D., Rapoff, M. A., Varghese, G., Porter, K., & Palmer, R. E.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-189
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065633665
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90203-a
- The paper
- Summers, J. D., Rapoff, M. A., Varghese, G., Porter, K., & Palmer, R. E. (1991). Psychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90203-a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.