The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury
Abstract
A longitudinal cohort study of 100 people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) was performed to determine the prevalence and severity of different types of pain (musculoskeletal, visceral, neuropathic at-level, neuropathic below-level) at 5 years following SCI. Prospective data on the characteristics of pain up to 6 months following injury had been collected previously and allowed comparisons between the presence of pain at different time points. In addition, we sought to determine the relationship between the presence of pain and physical factors related to the injury such as level of lesion, completeness and clinical SCI syndrome. We also obtained information regarding mood, global self-rated health and the impact of pain on function. Of the 100 subjects in the original cohort, 73 were available for follow up. When all types of pain were included, 59 of the 73 subjects (81%) reported the presence of pain. Musculoskeletal pain was the most common type of pain experienced and was present in 43 subjects (59%), at-level neuropathic pain was present in 30 subjects (41%), below-level neuropathic pain was present in 25 subjects (34%) and visceral pain was present in four subjects (5%). Overall, 58% reported their pain as severe or excruciating and those with visceral pain were most likely to rate their pain in these categories. There was no relationship between the presence of pain overall and level or completeness of lesion, or type of injury. However, tetraplegics were more likely to report below-level neuropathic pain. This study prospectively demonstrates the differing time courses of different types of pain over the first 5 years following SCI. There was a strong correlation between the presence of both types of neuropathic pain at 5 years and earlier time points but both visceral pain and musculoskeletal pain demonstrated a poor correlation between time points. Chronic visceral pain occurs in a small percentage of patients and does not correlate with the presence of visceral pain early following injury. Those with neuropathic pain early following their injury are likely to continue to experience ongoing pain and the pain is likely to be severe. In contrast, chronic musculoskeletal pain is more common but less likely to be severe and cannot be predicted by the presence of pain in the first 6 months following injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms
Merskey, H. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,362
Grading the severity of chronic pain
Von Korff, M., Ormel, J., Keefe, F. J., & Dworkin, S. F. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4 · Cited by 3,022
de C. Williams, A. C. (1995) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(95)90016-0 · Cited by 1,470
Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study.
Blyth, F. M., March, L. M., Brnabic, A. J. M., Jorm, L. R., Williamson, M., & Cousins, M. J. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00355-9 · Cited by 1,096
Self-citationSiddall, P. J., Taylor, D. A., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00023-8 · Cited by 304
Self-citationIntravenous lidocaine in central pain: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, psychophysical study
Attal, N., Gaudé, V., Brasseur, L., Dupuy, M., Guirimand, F., Parker, F., & Bouhassira, D. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.3.564 · Cited by 293
Rintala, D. H., Loubser, P. G., Castro, J., Hart, K. A., & Fuhrer, M. J. (1998) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90032-6 · Cited by 275
Classification of pain following spinal cord injury
Siddall, P. J., Taylor, D. A., & Cousins, M. J. (1997) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100365 · Cited by 250
Self-citationThe Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine and Clonidine in the Treatment of Pain After Spinal Cord Injury
Siddall, P. J., Molloy, A. R., Walker, S., Mather, L. E., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (2000) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1097/00000539-200012000-00037 · Cited by 233
Self-citationPsychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury pain
Summers, J. D., Rapoff, M. A., Varghese, G., Porter, K., & Palmer, R. E. (1991) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(91)90203-a · Cited by 218
Cited by
The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic neuropathic pain
Scholz, J., Finnerup, N. B., Attal, N., Aziz, Q., Baron, R., Bennett, M. I., Benoliel, R., Cohen, M., Cruccu, G., Davis, K. D., et al. (2019) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001365 · Cited by 1,171
Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Burke, D., Fullen, B. M., Stokes, D., & Lennon, O. (2017) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.905 · Cited by 402
Soler, M. D., Kumru, H., Pelayo, R., Vidal, J., Tormos, J. M., Fregni, F., Navarro, X., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq184 · Cited by 308
Widerström-Noga (2009) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2008.03.0038 · Cited by 228
Zhang, H., Chang, M., Hansen, C. N., Basso, D. M., & Noble-Haeusslein, L. J. (2011) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-011-0038-0 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Siddall, P. J., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-257
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037702549
- Cited by
- 964
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00452-9
- The paper
- Siddall, P. J., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (2003). A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00452-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.