The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cephalic muscle tenderness and pressure pain threshold in a general population
Abstract
Tenderness and pain thresholds in pericranial muscles were studied in a general population. A random sample of 1000 adults aged 25-64 years was drawn as part of the Glostrup Population Studies, and 740 adults were examined. This study was part of a multifacetted, epidemiological study of different headache disorders according to the new headache classification. Manual palpation and pressure pain threshold with an electronic pressure algometer were performed by observers blinded to other information such as the person's history of headache, previous illness and mental state. The muscles most commonly tender to manual palpation were the lateral pterygoid (55%), the trapezius (52%), and the sternocleido-mastoid muscles (51%). Females were more tender than men in all the muscles examined by manual palpation. In total, the young age group was more tender than the old age group (P = 0.03). Pressure pain thresholds on temporal muscles showed lower thresholds in women than in men (P less than 10(-3)), and in the total population thresholds increased with age (P less than 0.05). No side-to-side difference in tenderness by manual palpation was found, while the right side showed increased pain thresholds in right-handed individuals (P less than 10(-4)). No side-to-side difference was found in left-handed persons. This study provides data about the normal population and forms the necessary basis for evaluating the importance of muscle tenderness in headache subjects and other selected groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis
Riley, J. L., Robinson, M. E., Wise, E. A., Myers, C. D., & Fillingim, R. B. (1998) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00199-1 · Cited by 1,085
Lautenbacher, S., Peters, J. H., Heesen, M., Scheel, J., & Kunz, M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.039 · Cited by 536
Rasmussen, B. K. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90057-v · Cited by 499
Self-citationThe neurobiology of central sensitization
Harte, S. E., Harris, R. E., & Clauw, D. J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research · doi:10.1111/jabr.12137 · Cited by 394
Localization of pain-related brain activation: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging data
Duerden, E. G., & Albanese, M. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21416 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, R., Rasmussen, B. K., Pedersen, B., Lous, I., & Olesen, J.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-203
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059478187
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cephalic muscle tenderness and pressure pain threshold in a general population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90059-k
- The paper
- Jensen, R., Rasmussen, B. K., Pedersen, B., Lous, I., & Olesen, J. (1992). Cephalic muscle tenderness and pressure pain threshold in a general population. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90059-k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.