Cited by 112Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Temporal processes of formalin pain: differential role of the cingulum bundle, fornix pathway and medial bulboreticular formation

Vaccarino, Anthony L., Melzack, Ronald·1992·Pain

Abstract

Subcutaneous injection of formalin produces a characteristic biphasic pain response. An early phase develops in the first 5 min after injection; the pain then decreases for 10-15 min, followed by a gradual rise to a stable plateau that lasts about 1 h. Rats were injected with 1 microliter of 2% lidocaine or saline into the anterior cingulum bundle at 0 (immediately), 10 or 30 min prior to formalin injection, or 10, 20 or 30 min after formalin injection, and tested for analgesia in the late phase of the formalin test, 30-70 min after formalin injection. A time-dependent increase in analgesia was obtained when lidocaine was injected into the cingulum at periods ranging from 10 to 30 min after formalin injection, reflecting an anaesthetic duration of less than 20 min. When lidocaine was injected 0 or 10 min prior to formalin injection, a time-dependent increase in analgesia in the late phase was again observed. In these groups, lidocaine should have blocked cingulum activity during the early but not the late phase. The role of the fornix pathway and the medial bulboreticular formation in mediating formalin pain was also examined. Lidocaine produced analgesia in the late phase when injected into the fornix prior to formalin injection but had no effect when administered after it. In contrast, when lidocaine was injected into the medial bulboreticular formation it produced analgesia in the late phase when administered after formalin injection, but not prior to it. Taken together, t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90150-a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blockade of the rat cingulum bundle can cause analgesia.

    “Initial research showed that blockade of the rat cingulum bundle can cause analgesia (Vaccarino and Melzack, 1989; 1992)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Vaccarino and Melzack, 1992

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 104 · Cited by 112

Authors
Vaccarino, A. L., & Melzack, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Vaccarino, Anthony L.
Venue
Pain
Published
1992-05
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
257-271
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091657631
Cited by
112
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
formalin test, cingulum, central analgesia, central plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Efferent Pathways, Formaldehyde, Gyrus Cinguli, Hippocampus, Injections, Lidocaine, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reticular Formation, Time Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review