CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,022Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grading the severity of chronic pain

Von Korff, Michael, Ormel, Johan, Keefe, Francis J., Dworkin, Samuel F.·1992·Pain
DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research develops and evaluates a simple method of grading the severity of chronic pain for use in general population surveys and studies of primary care pain patients. Measures of pain intensity, disability, persistence and recency of onset were tested for their ability to grade chronic pain severity in a longitudinal study of primary care back pain (n = 1213), headache (n = 779) and temporomandibular disorder pain (n = 397) patients. A Guttman scale analysis showed that pain intensity and disability measures formed a reliable hierarchical scale. Pain intensity measures appeared to scale the lower range of global severity while disability measures appeared to scale the upper range of global severity. Recency of onset and days in pain in the prior 6 months did not scale with pain intensity or disability. Using simple scoring rules, pain severity was graded into 4 hierarchical classes: Grade I, low disability--low intensity; Grade II, low disability--high intensity; Grade III, high disability--moderately limiting; and Grade IV, high disability--severely limiting. For each pain site, Chronic Pain Grade measured at baseline showed a highly statistically significant and monotonically increasing relationship with unemployment rate, pain-related functional limitations, depression, fair to poor self-rated health, frequent use of opioid analgesics, and frequent pain-related doctor visits both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Days in Pain was related to these variables, but not as strongly as Chronic Pain Grade. Recent onset cases (first onset within the prior 3 months) did not show differences in psychological and behavioral dysfunction when compared to persons with less recent onset. Using longitudinal data from a population-based study (n = 803), Chronic Pain Grade at baseline predicted the presence of pain in the prior 2 weeks. Chronic Pain Grade and pain-related functional limitations at 3-year follow-up. Grading chronic pain as a function of pain intensity and pain-related disability may be useful when a brief ordinal measure of global pain severity is required. Pain persistence, measured by days in pain in a fixed time period, provides useful additional information.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Molenaar, 1982, Mokken scaling revisited, Kwant. Meth., 3, 145
  2. Molenaar, 1988, Mokken's approach to reliability estimation extended to multicategory items, Kwant. Meth., 9, 115
  3. SAS Institute Inc., 1989, Vol. 2, 891
  4. Spitzer, 1987, Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders, Spine, S1
  5. Whitney, C. and Von Korff, M., The magnitude of regression to the mean in before-after treatment comparisons of chronic pain. Pain, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,022

Related

Metadata

Authors
Von Korff, M., Ormel, J., Keefe, F. J., & Dworkin, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1992-08
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
133-149
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4
OpenAlex
W1966128258
Cited by
3,022
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 168 · 2019: 161 · 2018: 147 · 2017: 118 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 128 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 106
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS-06168, P01 HS06344)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (P01 DE08773, P01DE008773)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain intensity, pain-related disability, pain persistence, back pain, headache, temporomandibular disorders, functional limitations, depression, opioid analgesic use, primary care patients, unemployment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Behavior, Chronic Disease, Depression, Employment, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Narcotics, Pain, Pain Measurement, Statistics as Topic, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review