CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 187Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients

Jensen, Mark P., Strom, Susan E., Turner, Judith A., Romano, Joan M.·1992·Pain
DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90156-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the reliability and validity of the Roland scale (taken from the Sickness Impact Profile: SIP) as a measure of dysfunction among chronic pain patients. One hundred forty-four subjects completed the SIP when they were screened for admission to an inpatient pain management program. One hundred sixteen subjects were subsequently re-administered the SIP at admission to inpatient treatment. A 3-month post-treatment administration of the SIP was performed for 52 of these subjects. Roland scale scores were calculated from the SIP for each patient. Test-retest stability coefficients indicated that the SIP Roland scale was generally as reliable as the SIP Total, Physical, and Psychosocial scale scores. Consistent with previous research, correlational analyses indicated that the SIP Roland scale is strongly associated with the SIP Physical but not the SIP Psychosocial scale. The SIP Roland scale and the other SIP scales demonstrated similar sensitivity to changes associated with multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for chronic pain. Finally, the pattern of relationships between the SIP Roland scale and several pain-related measures supported the concurrent validity of the SIP Roland scale. The results of the analyses were very similar for patients presenting with and without low back pain. The study supports the reliability and validity of the SIP Roland scale items for assessing dysfunction of chronic pain patients with pain in sites other than the low back as well as those with low back pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90156-6

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 187

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, M. P., Strom, S. E., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Mark P.
ORCID
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1992-08
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
157-162
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0304-3959(92)90156-6
OpenAlex
W2004901652
Cited by
187
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32ns008545-02)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 06344)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS08545)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
Sickness Impact Profile, chronic pain, functional disability, psychometric validity, test-retest reliability, multidisciplinary pain management, low back pain, psychosocial functioning, physical function
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review